Mitral valve‐in‐valve replacement supported by a transapically snared guidewire via septostomy

We describe a 72‐year‐old woman, a known case of rheumatic heart disease with a history of mitral and aortic valve replacement 8 years previously, who underwent mitral valve‐in‐valve replacement supported by a transapically snared guidewire through septostomy.     

The safety and feasibility of minimal invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) of the posterior aspect of the humerus: A cadaveric study

The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of applying MIPO of the humerus via the posterior approach and to observe the tension of the radial nerve in different elbow positions. Two separate incisions were made on the posterior aspect of the humerus in ten fresh cadavers (20 humeri). The radial nerve was identified at the proximal incision and the distances through which the nerve could be elevated from the bone with the elbow in flexion and extension were measured. A 10‐hole extra‐articular distal humeral locking compression plate was inserted and fixed through the submuscular tunnel. The tunnel was then explored to identify any entrapment of the radial nerve and to observe the anatomical relationship of the radial nerve to the plate and bone. There was no entrapment of the radial nerve or its branches. The distances through which the radial nerve could be elevated were greater with the elbow in extension than in flexion (P < 0.01). The radial nerve crossed the medial and lateral borders of the posterior surface of the humerus at 80.1–132 mm (average 104.7 mm) and 116.6–175.5 mm (average 142.7 mm) of its total length, respectively. The axillary nerve was located at 38.7–61.7 mm (average 47.9 mm) of total humeral length. MIPO of the humerus using the posterior approach is an alternative option for treating distal humeral shaft fracture. The risk of radial nerve injury can be minimized by careful dissection in the proximal incision. Clin. Anat. 32:176–182, 2019. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Lasting improvements in left spatial neglect following a protocol combining neck-muscle vibration and voluntary arm movements: a case-study

Purpose: Beyond promising experimental results of sensory passive stimulations in spatial cognition disorders, some questions still remain regarding interests of these stimulations during the daily activities in neglect. The aim of this case-study was to evaluate the effects of a protocol combining left neck-muscle vibration with daily simple movements, like arm pointing movements, on perceptivo-locomotor deficits in a left spatial neglect patient.

Materials and methods: Two neuropsychological tests, one subjective straight-ahead pointing (SSA) test and one wheelchair navigation test were carried out before the combination protocol, immediately after, 1?h later, and 24?h later.

Results: The results showed a reduction of neglect spatial bias following the protocol lasted at least 24?h in all the tests (except for the SSA test due to the unavailability of the pointing device).

Conclusions: The range of improvements in the symptoms of spatial neglect suggests that this therapeutic intervention based on the combining neck-muscle vibration to voluntary arm movements could be a useful treatment for this condition. One of future investigation axes should be the development of a vibratory tool in order to facilitate the combining this proprioceptive stimulation to daily activities.

• Implications for rehabilitation

• Spatial neglect is a perplexing neuropsychological syndrome, affecting different domains of spatial cognition and impacting also the functional domain.

• The treatments based on neck-muscle vibration are simple to use, non-invasive and requires none active participation of patient.

• A therapeutic intervention based on the combining left neck-muscle vibration and voluntary arm movements in a left-spatial-neglect show a lasting reduction of symptoms especially in daily activities.

• The combination of treatments based on the Bottom–Up approach opens innovative perspectives in rehabilitation.

     

The effect of surgical approach in total knee replacement on outcomes. An analysis of 875,166 elective operations from the National Joint Registry for England,Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man

BackgroundTotal knee replacement (TKR) is clinically and cost-effective. The surgical approach employed influences the outcome, however there is little generalisable and robust evidence to guide practice. We compared outcomes between the common primary TKR surgical approaches.Methods875,166 primary TKRs captured in the National Joint Registry, linked to hospital inpatient, mortality and patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) data, with up to 15.75 years follow-up were analysed. There were 10 surgical approach groups: medial parapatellar, midvastus, subvastus, lateral parapatellar, ‘other’ and their minimally invasive versions. Survival methods were used to compare revision rates and 45-day mortality. Groups were compared using Cox proportional hazards regression and Flexible Parametric Survival Modelling (FPM). Confounders included age at surgery, sex, risk group (indications additional to osteoarthritis), American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, TKR fixation, year of primary, body mass index, and for mortality, deprivation and Charlson comorbidity subgroups. PROMs were analysed with regression modelling or non-parametric methods.ResultsThe conventional midvastus approach was associated with lower revision rates (Hazard Rate Ratio (HRR) 0.80 (95% CI 0.71–0.91) P = 0.001) and the lateral parapatellar with higher revision rates (HRR 1.35 (95% CI 1.12–1.63) P = 0.002) compared to the conventional medial parapatellar approach. Mortality rates were similar between approaches. PROMs showed statistically significant, but not clinically important, differences.ConclusionsThere is little difference in PROMs between the various surgical approaches in TKR with all resulting in good outcomes. However, the conventional midvastus approach (used in 3% of cases) was associated with a 20% reduced risk of revision surgery compared to the most commonly used knee approach (the conventional medial parapatellar: used in 91.9% of cases). This data supports the use of the midvastus approach and thus surgeons should consider utilising this approach more frequently. Minimally invasive approaches did not appear to convey any clinical advantage in this study over conventional approaches for primary TKR.